![]() Here is why dynamic sites are everywhere: So which should you choose for your next project? The tried-and-true dynamic, the speed of static, or a cutting-edge hybrid?ĭespite the industry shift towards static and hybrid sites, dynamic architectures are still by far the most common way of building websites. Luckily, if you understand your project needs and can evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each architecture, choosing between them doesn’t have to be a mystery. Uses templating and backend languages like PHP, Ruby and Python Dynamicĭoes not scale automatically with traffic spikesīest with a headless CMS or serverless databaseĬontent is localized before and after page load Impossible on a purely static site because you have no way of knowing the user location. Possible, and pretty straightforward, on both dynamic and hybrid sites. Say for example you wanted to show real-time weather information to your users. Because they are still hosted on a CDN, hybrid sites rely on new technologies like edge computing and serverless functions to display dynamic content. Hybrid websites are an emerging third choice born out of a need to keep the speed and security gains of static, but to also include dynamic elements when needed. These features make static websites faster and more secure at the expense of content personalization. Static websites use a content delivery network (CDN) and headless CMS to serve the same pre-generated content to every user. ![]() ![]() What is the difference between static and dynamic websites?ĭynamic websites are backed by a traditional server and database, making them better at serving personalized or real-time content than their static counterparts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |